Ontario Science Centre Closes Indefinitely, But Architect Offers Free Services for Repairs

Ontario Science Centre to close due to roof issues, but architect offers free services for repairs

The Ontario Science Centre has been closed indefinitely after an engineering report revealed that some roof panels were at risk of collapse, leading to discussions about the need for a complete roof replacement. The report also cited concerns about the weight of snow on the roof as a potential risk factor. However, the firm of the late architect Raymond Moriyama has stated that closing the building is not necessary and that manageable repairs are possible.

In a statement released today, Moriyama Teshima Architects expressed shock at the abrupt decision to permanently close the science centre. They have offered their architectural services pro bono to assist with the necessary repairs, which they believe can be completed without the need for a full roof replacement. Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma has cited concerns about snow-related damage as a reason for closing the science centre by October 31st, allowing employees time to move exhibits out before winter sets in.

However, there have been criticisms regarding how the government handled this closure situation. The firm behind the building’s architecture advocated for a different approach to addressing these issues and believes that closing it is not necessary. As discussions continue about what will happen next with this beloved cultural institution, it remains uncertain what steps will be taken to address these concerns raised in engineering reports.

Moriyama Teshima Architects believes that repairing and restoring Ontario Science Centre is possible without having to rebuild it from scratch. The company’s offer of free pro bono services shows their commitment towards preserving this iconic landmark.

The sudden closure of Ontario Science Centre has shocked many people who had visited and appreciated its scientific exhibitions over time. Many are now wondering what will happen next with this beloved cultural institution and whether its restoration will be possible.

As we await further developments on this matter, we can only hope that both parties can come together and find a solution that prioritizes preserving history while ensuring safety for visitors and employees alike.