Is anyone really a scientist? The Science Dispatch podcast explores the debate around Holden Thorpe’s claim that journalists and policy professionals can be considered scientists.

Holden Thorpe, editor-in-chief of the academic journal ‘Science,’ has made some controversial claims in recent years. One of his assertions is that anyone involved in science, including journalists, policy professionals, and activists, can be considered a scientist. However, Dr. Henry Miller from ACSH disagrees with this notion.

In a recent episode of the Science Dispatch podcast, Cameron English and Dr. Chuck Dinerstein discussed the implications of Thorpe’s statement. They highlighted how the editor-in-chief of a reputable scientific journal should have a clear understanding of who can be considered a scientist. Unfortunately, Thorpe’s definition seems to be overly broad and may not accurately reflect the qualifications required to be a true scientist.

Listeners can tune into the Science Dispatch podcast on platforms like iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, and Google Podcasts. By subscribing to the podcast or signing up for the Dispatch newsletter, individuals can stay informed about important scientific discussions and developments. It is crucial to distinguish between those who are truly scientists and those who simply work in or support the field of science.

The debate around who qualifies as a scientist raises important questions about the role that science plays in society. As we continue to rely on scientific research to inform our decisions and policies, it is essential that we have a clear understanding of what it means to be a scientist. While there may be different interpretations of what qualifies someone as a scientist, it is crucial that we strive for accuracy and clarity in our definitions to ensure that scientific research continues to advance and inform our world effectively.